Reducing or eliminating construction claims

a new contracting process (NCP)

Litigation has traditionally been a large part of the cost of construction, ranking second to personal liability as a source of litigation in North America.This is largely due to poor processes and wasteful contracting.The New Contracting Process (NCP) is an attempt to lower litigation costs by addressing the process of risk apportionment and approach to mediation in written contracts.There are four main elements to the NCP in the formation and management of construction contracts: prequalifying bidders, apportioning risks, approaching mediation proactively, and finishing contracts more efficiently.Using the NCP should result in fewer disputes, fewer contract failures, better working relationships, and ultimately lower construction costs and improve ability to construct a quality facility.
member content locked
PMI member benefit.

or Join

Advertisement

Advertisement

Related Content

  • PM Network

    Rookie Revelations member content locked

    PM Network asks the project management community to share their mistakes made at the beginning of their careers.

  • PM Network

    Interior Motives member content locked

    By Wenger, Fred Project managers are accustomed to looking outside their projects for risks—at competitors, clients, suppliers, the economy, even the weather. But experience has taught me that all projects face a…

  • PM Network

    New Digs member content locked

    By Waity, C. J. Ore deposits are hardly the only factor project leaders use to determine future mining sites in Latin America. Everything from geopolitical turmoil to local labor markets can impact a mining…

  • PM Network

    Past Is Prologue member content locked

    By Hendershot, Steve Organizations can't escape the past when they pump money into tech upgrades. Before they start rolling out cool new tech, project teams need to identify and mitigate the risk of putting fancy new…

  • PM Network

    Bank Breach member content locked

    Dankse Bank A/S came under scrutiny for failing to prevent suspected money laundering at its Estonian branch, and a shelved IT project may be to blame.

Advertisement

Publishing or acceptance of an advertisement is neither a guarantee nor endorsement of the advertiser's product or service. View advertising policy.