Making Innovation Happen in a Megaproject

London's Crossrail Suburban Railway System

img

Click HERE to download the PDF

Andrew Davies, School of Construction and Project Management, University College London, United Kingdom

Samuel MacAulay, UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Tim DeBarro, Consultant, Nichols Group

Mark Thurston, Regional Managing Director, Europe CH2M HILL

img   ABSTRACT

KEY WORDS

Megaprojects Innovation

This research explores how the innovation process can be systematically organized to improve the performance of mega infrastructure projects. It presents the initial findings of a research project between Crossrail and researchers at Imperial College London and University College London. The aim of action research is to formulate and implement an innovation strategy to improve the performance and outcomes of the project.

img   THE PROBLEM

“In the world of megaprojects, innovation is often avoided because of its association with uncertainty and increasing costs. Sponsors, clients, and contractors are reluctant to introduce novel ideas and innovative approaches and often seek to minimize the risks involved by relying on tried-and-tested methods.”

Megaprojects are often late, over budget, and fail to achieve their original specifications and revenue targets. This presents a paradox, because more megaprojects continue to be executed despite their poor record of productivity.

In most industries it is widely understood that improvements in performance depend on innovation. However, in the world of megaprojects, innovation is often avoided because of its association with uncertainty and increasing costs. Sponsors, clients, and contractors are reluctant to introduce novel ideas and innovative approaches and often seek to minimize the risks involved by relying on tried-and-tested methods. They prefer to select the lowest-price bid, transfer risks to contractors, freeze the design as early as possible, and stick rigidly to the original plan.

img   THE STUDY

This research presents the findings of an ongoing three-year (2012–2014) research project between Crossrail and researchers at Imperial College London and University College London. More specifically, the study focuses on the findings emerging from the action research1 part of the study, which aimed to formulate and implement an innovation strategy to improve the performance and out-come of the project.

img   FINDINGS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The research identifies four opportunity windows to intervene and promote innovation in a megaproject, which are presented in the following table, and that can be generalized to other innovative megaprojects.

Innovation Opportunity Window Key Activities
Bridging
During the preparations and front-end planning

Targeted search for and integration of innovative practices, technologies, and organizational processes that will improve the current project's performance.

Search focused on previous projects and related industries

Engaging
During design of tendering process and contracting processes

Develop new ways of contracting/ tendering.

Create incentives and rewards to encourage the search for innovative solutions.

Leveraging
Occurs after contracts have been awarded and core supply chain formed

Develop a strategy and process to mobilize delivery partners, contractors, and suppliers to develop new ideas, technologies, and organizational practices.

Apply innovation to improve the performance of different phases of the project.

Exchanging
Occurs during and after the project has been executed

Connect with the wider project ecosystem to share and trade innovations.

Partner with other parts of the ecosystem to pool resources to fund the pursuit of common innovation needs.

Bridging: The bridging window occurred when Crossrail's sponsors were planning the project and establishing CRL2 as the client organization responsible for managing the program. Efforts were made to learn lessons and recruit senior managers able to apply experience gained on other megaprojects and combine successful practices, technologies, and approaches in innovative new combinations.

Engaging: The engaging window occurred when CRL began the tendering process of selecting the major works involved in the design; construction of tunnels, platforms, and stations; and supply of rolling stock and signaling systems.

Leveraging: The leveraging window occurred after the CRL contracts were procured and involves encouraging selected contractors and their suppliers to develop and apply innovation in different phases of the project.

Exchanging: The exchanging window describes the opportunity associated with connecting the Crossrail megaproject with the wider project ecosystem to trade existing innovations, as well as partnering to pursue common innovation objectives.

img   FINAL REMARKS

The action research with Crossrail provided a unique opportunity to observe and participate in a pioneering effort to develop and implement an innovation strategy. The framework of four innovation opportunity windows could provide a useful heuristic tool, for creating and capturing significant additional value during each phase of a megaproject.

Crossrail innovation strategy was tailored according to the requirements of a megaproject involving a large coalition of contractors and suppliers who were coordinated by a temporary client organization. The strategy was implemented in early 2013 and it is too early to assess the impact of the innovation program on the performance of the project.

img   FULL CITATION

Davies A, MacAulay S, DeBarro T, Thurston M. (2015) Making Innovation Happen in a Megaproject: London's Crossrail Suburban Railway System. Project Management Journal, Volume 45 (December/January), Number 6.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

img  PMJ articles and Sponsored Research monographs are available to members for free download.

img  Monographs can also be purchased at the PMI Store on PMI.org.

img

From Academia: Summaries of New Research for the Reflective Practitioner | May 2015

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE

14 Campus Blvd | Newtown Square, PA | 19073-3299 USA

Tel: +1 610 356 4600 | Fax: +1 610 356 4647

e-mail: [email protected] | PMI.org/research

© 2015 Project Management Institute, Inc.
All rights reserved. “PMI” and the PMI logo are marks of Project Management Institute, Inc.
For a comprehensive list of PMI marks, contact the PMI Legal Department. ACA-253-2015

1Action Research is either research initiated to solve an immediate problem or progressive problem solving led by individuals working with others in teams or as part of a community of practice to improve the way they address issues and solve problems.

2Crossrail Limited

Advertisement

Advertisement

Related Content

  • Project Management Journal

    Navigating Tensions to Create Value member content locked

    By Farid, Parinaz | Waldorff, Susanne Boche This article employs institutional logics to explore the change program–organizational context interface, and investigates how program management actors navigate the interface to create value.

  • Project Management Journal

    Getting Past the Editor's Desk member content locked

    By Klein, Gary | Müller, Ralf To reach acceptance, every research paper submitted to Project Management Journal® (PMJ) must pass several hurdles. This editorial aims to declare the editorial process and reveal major reasons for…

  • Project Management Journal

    Investigating the Dynamics of Engineering Design Rework for a Complex Aircraft Development Project member content locked

    By Souza de Melo, Érika | Vieira, Darli | Bredillet, Christophe The purpose of this research is to evaluate the dynamics of EDR that negatively impacts the performance of complex PDPs and to suggest actions to overcome those problems.

  • Project Management Journal

    Coordinating Lifesaving Product Development Projects with no Preestablished Organizational Governance Structure member content locked

    By Leme Barbosa, Ana Paula Paes | Figueiredo Facin, Ana Lucia | Sergio Salerno, Mario | Simões Freitas, Jonathan | Carelli Reis, Marina | Paz Lasmar, Tiago We employed a longitudinal, grounded theory approach to investigate the management of an innovative product developed in the context of a life-or-death global emergency.

  • Project Management Journal

    Narratives of Project Risk Management member content locked

    By Green, Stuart D. | Dikmen, Irem The dominant narrative of project risk management pays homage to scientific rationality while conceptualizing risk as objective fact.

Advertisement