Public Reprimand

Graeme Bond has been found to be in violation of the Project Management Institute Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (the “Code”). An Ethics Review Committee (“ERC”) Hearing Panel determined that Mr. Bond acted in violation of Code section 5.3.1, which states that, as practitioners in the global project management community, we require the following of ourselves and our fellow practitioners:

5.3.1: We do not engage in or condone behavior that is designed to deceive others, including but not limited to, making misleading or false statements, stating half-truths, providing information out of context or withholding information that, if known, would render our statements as misleading or incomplete.

The case at issue entailed statements made by the Respondent related to his membership status that were found by the ERC to be misleading and incomplete. The ERC ordered a public reprimand and an expulsion from membership.

Pamela Baker has been found to be in violation of the Project Management Institute Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (the “Code”). An Ethics Review Committee (“ERC”) Hearing Panel determined that Ms. Baker acted in violation of Code provisions 2.3.1 and 3.3.4. Those provisions state that, as practitioners in the global project management community, we require the following of ourselves and our fellow practitioners:

2.3.1: We inform ourselves and uphold the policies, rules, regulations, and laws that govern our work, professional, and volunteer activities.

3.3.4: We respect the property rights of others.

The case at issue entailed the use by the Respondent of materials created by another individual without permission from that individual. Further, the Respondent failed to participate in the ethics proceedings. The ERC found that these violations occurred and ordered a public reprimand and a suspension of membership.

Matthew Weaver has been found to be in violation of the Project Management Institute (“PMI”) Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (the “Code”). An Ethics Review Committee (“ERC”) Hearing Panel determined that Mr. Weaver acted in violation of Code provisions 2.3.1 and 3.3.1. Those provisions state that, as practitioners in the global project management community, we require the following of ourselves and our fellow practitioners:

2.3.1: We inform ourselves and uphold the policies, rules, regulations, and laws that govern our work, professional, and volunteer activities.

3.3.1: We do not act in an abusive manner toward others.

The case at issue entailed a dispute between the Respondent and an individual who was owed money from a training company owned by the Respondent. The ERC found that the Respondent’s conduct in connection with this dispute violated the above-referenced Code provisions. The ERC found ordered a public reprimand and a permanent expulsion from PMI membership and certification status.