Project Management Institute

From making sense to making cents

measuring project management ROI -- part 1

ExecutiveNotebook

by Joan Knutson, Contributing Editor

ONE OF THE HOTTEST topics today is how to measure the success (or lack thereof) of the project management discipline within an organization. In my view, there are four plateaus that allow us to measure the return on investment that companies are making in the implementation and maintenance of project management.

Measurement Plateau 1 – Comprehension and Acceptance. Often evaluated by seeing, hearing/talking, feeling, smelling (the five senses) that project management is being used.

Does investment in project management pay off? That can be—quite literally— the $64,000 question.

Measurement Plateau 2 – Application. Judged by the frequency and accuracy with which the technical and socio-components of project management are applied.

Measurement Plateau 3 – Influence on the Business. Assessed by quantifying the business results that have been produced by the existence of the discipline of project management.

Measurement Plateau 4 – Return on Investment (ROI). Appraised through the use of a standard return on investment series of calculations.

Measurement Plateau 1 is the least quantifiable and relies more upon subjective observation, while Measurement Plateau 4 is derived from solid mathematical calculations of the return on investment based on credible, quantifiable data. In other words, as one moves from Measurement Plateau 1 to Measurement Plateau 4, one moves from measuring how the environment “senses” the success or failure of project management to how the environment can be shown the additional “cents” (and dollars) attained through the use of the discipline of project management.

This month, I'll focus on the fourth plateau, Return on Investment. Next month, for those folks who do not have an environment in which they can effectively use a highly quantifiable return on investment approach, we will share techniques to employ Plateaus 1, 2, and 3, with almost as much power and credibility.


images

Joan Knutson is founder and president of Project Mentors, a San Francisco-based project management training and consulting firm. She can be reached at 415/955-5777. Send your comments to editorial@pmi.org.

images

Plateau 4: Return on Investment. Generically, return on investment evaluates the earnings derived from a venture as compared to the investment expended to complete the venture. Obviously, in order to make the venture viable, earnings need to be equal to or (preferably) greater than the investment.

In the project management realm, the objective is still the same: to determine the benefits (expressed in monetary terms) of employing the project management discipline as compared to the monetary costs of implementing and/or maintaining that discipline.

Let's address this by looking at (1) a review of the return on investment series of calculations; (2) consideration of the categories of success upon which the discipline of project management might be evaluated; (3) consideration of the categories of benefits and the categories of costs that could be used to complete the ROI calculation; and (4) an example (as explained in the sidebar).

ROI Calculations. There are two ways to prove that monies spent to sustain project management in an organization are generating a positive return.

ROI Worked Example

Success Criterion: There is a documented project management process, and it is being applied.

Benefits (Suggested Metrics): Appropriate project management outputs are generated. Target value: 70 percent of projects have the project management documents in the appropriate phase, which will reduce the number of status review meetings required.

Costs: Expenditure of core team salaries and benefits to develop and roll out the project management process.

ROI Calculation:

Monetary benefits from status review meeting reduction:

images Value of one meeting = $1,000

images Annual number of meetings for one project = 50 (one per week); half of the meetings will not be required because we are following a standard process; therefore total number of meetings required per project = 25

images 70 percent of the total number of projects = 10

images Reduced number of meetings = 250

images Savings are $1,000 X 250 = $250,000

Monetary costs to develop a project management process:

images Labor (indirect; i.e. internal staff)                        $100,000

images Labor (direct; i.e. outside consultant)                    $50,000

images Materials (binders, repro)                                         $5,000

images Training                                                                  $25,000

Monetary costs to maintain a project management process:

images Labor (indirect; i.e. internal staff per year)             $20,000

images Total                                                                      $200,000

Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR):

images

For every dollar invested, $1.25 has been returned.

Return on Investment (ROI):

images

In other words, the process has generated a 25 percent return on the investment. images

The first option is a dollar evaluation called Benefit-to-Cost Ratio. This calculation determines dollars returned for every dollar invested. If the number is a positive, the venture is pulling its weight. If the result is a negative, the venture is not returning its investment. The specific formula is:

images

Example. If the $ Benefits were $100 and the $ Costs were $50, the Benefit-Cost Ratio would be $2.00. This would mean that for every one dollar invested, there were two dollars returned. Not bad, getting double one's money back for an investment!

The second option is presented as a percentage. This calculation determines the percentage return for every dollar involved. A result of 0 percent means that the investment has reached breakeven; in other words, the dollars spent have just been recouped, no more and no less. If the result is less than 0 percent, the investment has not yet paid off. If the result is greater than 0 percent, the investment has paid itself off, and even more. There are two steps involved in this calculation:

First, determine the Net Benefits (NB), which indicates whether the costs are more or less than the benefits expressed in monetary terms.

$ Benefits – $ Costs = Net Benefits (NB)

Second, compute the ratio of the net benefits as compared to the dollars (cost) which were expended in order to attain those net benefits.

images

Example: Taking the example above in which the $ Benefits was $100 and the $ Cost was $50, the Net Benefit would be $50 and the ROI % would be 100 percent. In other words, not only has the venture broken even (reached the 0 percent mark), but it has returned 100 percent on its investment.

Either of these calculations, presenting a dollar return or a ratio or percentage return, should be acceptable to convince interested parties that the project management discipline is making “a positive difference” within the organization.

Categories of Success for Project Management Evaluation. There are six possible criteria upon which the discipline of project management might be evaluated:

images Documented project management exists and is being applied

images Project customers are more satisfied with project performance

images Improved accuracy of project planning

images Improved ability to monitor project status

images Effective mechanism in place for collecting and disseminating lessons learned (which equals improving project performance)

images Effective process for documenting change of scope/requirements and their impact on the project (which equals reducing the number or requests and, for those received, assuring payment for additional work requests [effort]).

Categories of Benefits and Costs to Compute ROI. The goal is to place a value on each unit of data that can be collected to measure project management success or failure. This data can relate to single projects or to specific project management initiatives, which will ultimately be rolled up to a composite figure. This composite figure defines the success of the project management discipline as a whole. We can either evaluate the quantifiable success (or failure) of each project that is performed and ultimately roll up the varied Dollar Returns or Percentage Returns into a composite figure. Or we can isolate varied project management initiatives similarly in order to determine their dollar or percentage return and roll those figures up to a final proof of success. Examples of project management initiatives are efforts such as a project management methodology, an organizational infrastructure, an automated support suite.

Because each of us work in such different industries, here's a generic list of sources from which both $ Benefits and $ Costs can be ascertained.

Sources of Generic $ Benefits. The list of generic dollar benefits ranges from very tangible dollar benefits to more subjective, yet valid, units of measure:

images Contribution to profit

images Savings of costs

images Increase in quantity of output converted to a dollar value

images Quality improvements translated into the three bulleted items above.

images Value of time; reduced employee effort interpreted into loaded labor dollars (salary plus benefits)

images Comparison to various benchmarks: your organization's historical database(s); similar organization's history; professional trade organizations; government statistics

images Evaluation gathered through questionnaires from project sponsors, customers, management steering committee, project managers, project team members, and internal or external subject matter experts.

Sources of Generic $ Costs. This list is much more tangible and includes less subjective data than the $ Benefits list.

images Cost to design and develop, preferably prorated over the expected life of the program

images Recurring costs to maintain the program

images Cost of materials

images Cost of quality

images Cost of travel and expenses

images Cost of facilities

images Cost of management

images Cost to train—loaded labor budget (salary and benefits) of the participants

images Administration and overhead costs.

BENEFIT COST AND/OR return on investment analysis take time, effort and some ingenuity. However, if they are necessary to convince the powers-that-be to approve or continue funding the project management initiative, it will be worth every moment, and every cent.

Next month we'll look at the other three Measurement Plateaus: Comprehension and Acceptance; Application; and Influence on Business. We'll also propose a process to gather, analyze and report this data images


Reader Service Number 5027

This material has been reproduced with the permission of the copyright owner. Unauthorized reproduction of this material is strictly prohibited. For permission to reproduce this material, please contact PMI.

JANUARY 1999 PM NETWORK

Advertisement

Advertisement

Related Content

  • Project Management Journal

    The Long Road to Benefits Management member content locked

    By Svejvig, Per | Schlichter, Bjarne Rerup This article reports on a four- year action research study, where the aims were to study benefits management at a detailed, practical level and to evaluate the benefits management practices applied.…

  • PM Network

    A Measure of Urgency

    By Grgurich, Hayley Saving the planet is the ultimate goal for climate change initiatives. But before those projects get the green light, their leaders must show how they're moving the needle. Three project leaders…

  • PM Network

    Prefab Push

    To drive down construction costs, shave project schedules and sidestep the U.S. labor shortage hindering its build projects, hotel brand Marriott announced in 2017 that it would be embracing modular…

  • PM Network

    Transfer of Power

    By Parsi, Novid Anxiety and opportunity have gripped Germany's project management. With all eyes focused on post-Brexit repercussions, political and economic uncertainty threaten to slow Germany's full-throttle…

  • PM Network

    Leading Edge

    By Fister Gale, Sarah In the face of unprecedented disruption, organizations must adapt. This year's PMI® Project Excellence Award winners proved that, when teams embrace the need to pivot, they can deliver real value to…

Advertisement