Does Real Options Reasoning Support Or Oppose Project Performance?

Empirical Evidence From Electronic Commerce Projects

Share to0

ArticleQuality Management, Risk Management1 August 2017

Project Management Journal

Jahanshahi, Asghar Afshar | Brem, Alexander

How to cite this article:

Jahanshahi, A. A., & Brem, A. (2017). Does Real Options Reasoning Support Or Oppose Project Performance?: Empirical Evidence From Electronic Commerce Projects. Project Management Journal, 48(4), 39–54.
Reprints and Permissions – opens in a new tab

There is a consensus among scholars that real options reasoning is crucial for improving project performance but there has been little empirical support thus far; hence, we explore how real options reasoning may influence project timeliness, efficiency, and effectiveness. Our longitudinal analysis of 110 electronic commerce projects, drawn from new technology ventures, indicated the differential effects of real options reasoning on project performance. We find that higher uncertainty does not always lead to a greater use of real options reasoning. Although perceived environmental state uncertainty is positively linked to real options, perceived environmental effect and response uncertainty are not.

Offer from our training partner

Advertisement

Offer from our training partner

Advertisement

Related Content

Offer from our training partner

Advertisement